Computer Vision Dedicated AI Engineering Teams Groundlight · May 25, 2026

Scaling a computer vision safety platform with an embedded team

A four-engineer team embedded with Groundlight, a US computer vision SaaS, since December 2022. The team ships frontend and backend product work against the Groundlight roadmap, retained on a monthly basis.

Geography
Pacifica, California
Year
2022
Stage
11 to 50 employees
Team
1 senior + 3 mid full-stack engineers and 1 product designer
Duration
December 2022 to ongoing
Engagement size
$50,000 to $199,999

The situation

Groundlight is a US-based computer vision SaaS for industrial safety. The core product is an API that lets customers ask natural-language questions about an image or video stream (is a hard hat on, is the safety guard in place, is a door open) and get an immediate answer back, with human reviewers in the loop when the model is uncertain. The product applies across manufacturing, facilities, and any environment where machine vision combined with human verification shortens time-to-detection.

As Groundlight grew from an MVP into a SaaS product, the bottleneck was engineering bandwidth on both the frontend and the backend. The customer-facing interface needed real product work (managing detectors, viewing detector improvement over time, surfacing labeler performance reports), and the in-house team did not have headcount to ship at that pace.

Groundlight found Leanware through a Google search. The brief was straightforward: extend the internal engineering team with frontend and backend developers who could be trusted to work on the production system without heavy hand-holding.

What we built

The engagement is dedicated-team capacity, retained on a monthly basis. The team has been embedded with Groundlight since December 2022: one senior full-stack engineer, three mid-level full-stack engineers, and a product designer. AI fluency is a baseline on the team rather than a specialty rate, which matters here because Groundlight's product is a computer vision system and the engineering work routinely touches the ML feedback loop. The point of contact rotates between engineers depending on which part of the system is shipping that sprint.

The work spans the production system. On the frontend, the team owns the customer-facing detector management UI in React Native, which is the interface a customer uses to create a detector, upload images, label new examples, and watch detector accuracy improve over time. On the backend, the team works in Django and Python, integrating with the labeling teams that supply human-in-the-loop answers when the computer vision model is uncertain about a frame.

A representative thread of work the team has shipped: when the algorithm produces an incorrect or low-confidence answer, the system routes the image to a labeling reviewer; the reviewer response is then incorporated into the detector training loop. Building that loop reliably (labeler queueing, reviewer feedback ingestion, accuracy-over-time visualization) required engineering across the stack and ongoing iteration with the data team.

The team has also shipped image bounding-box authoring (so customers can mark regions of interest before training a detector), per-customer account metrics, signup flows, and a series of UI/UX improvements aimed at manufacturing operators rather than the engineering audience the early product was shaped for. Tech stack: React Native, Django, Python, PostgreSQL, AWS, Kubernetes, GitHub Actions.

Communication runs on Slack and Jira. Code goes through the Groundlight internal review process; the team works increasingly independently as code quality has held over time.

Outcome

  • Frontend launches every 2 to 3 weeks, up from a small fraction of that pre-engagement

    Source ↗
  • 5.0 / 5 on Clutch across Quality, Schedule, Cost, and Willing to refer

    Source ↗
  • Engagement retained since December 2022 (three years and counting)

  • $120,000 invested as of the Clutch review window

    Source ↗

Three years in and counting. The frontend went from intermittent shipping to substantial launches every two to three weeks, and the engagement has expanded from a frontend trial into full-stack ownership over multiple parts of the product. Code-quality review has held to the point where the team now works increasingly independently. The Clutch review came in at 5.0 out of 5 across every category, with $120,000 invested at that point.

The qualitative thread that runs through the relationship is trust. Morgan Venable, Head of Product at Groundlight, has been on record describing the engagement as "so much more" than an outsourcing partnership and noting the senior engineers are "always around to support us." Decision input flows in both directions. Groundlight respects the technical input the team brings, and the team takes ownership of code quality and direction without close management.

"We trust their judgment because they are extremely reliable."

— Morgan Venable , Head of Product , Groundlight · Pacifica, California

Engagement FAQ

How accurate can computer vision be for PPE detection in real factory conditions?

In controlled conditions, PPE detectors (hard hat, high-vis vest) commonly hit 95%+ precision and recall. In real factory conditions (occlusion, poor lighting, dust, covered helmets) expect 85% to 95% after careful data collection and augmentation. Accuracy improves with more diverse training data, proper camera placement, and periodic retraining.

How long does it take to develop an MVP for industrial computer vision monitoring?

A pragmatic MVP can be delivered in 6 to 12 weeks if requirements and access to the floor (video, annotations) are ready. That covers camera placement, a basic model (hard hat or high-vis detection), edge proof-of-concept, and alerting. More complex rules, custom models, or strict compliance can extend timelines to 3 to 6 months.

What hardware (cameras, edge devices) is needed for factory floor computer vision?

Industrial PoE cameras with IR or low-light capability, rugged housing, appropriate lenses (wide or narrow depending on coverage), and fixed mounts. Edge inference appliances like the NVIDIA Jetson family, Intel NCS2, or small form-factor servers for on-prem inference. Choose cameras and edge devices rated for the temperature, dust, and EMI of the actual environment.

What happens when the computer vision system fails? Are backup procedures needed?

Design for failure. Graceful degradation (fall back to simpler heuristics or alerts), human-in-the-loop escalation, redundant edge nodes, and health checks with heartbeat monitoring. Define SOPs for supervisors when the system is offline (manual observation, increased signage), and have on-call support and an incident playbook. Keep a local buffer (ring buffer) so recent footage is available for postmortem when systems recover.

computer vision dedicated team react native django industrial safety

Related cases

OpenAI-powered RAG layer live for incident correlation and context-aware classification

Connect Capable

A dedicated-team backend and AI engagement supporting Connect Capable's traffic incident management platform. Work covers OpenAI-powered incident correlation, data pipeline refactoring, and the Azure-side infrastructure that runs it.

Dedicated AI Engineering Teams Read case study
Senior data engineering and tech-lead capacity embedded with the in-house team

Greyhound Engineering

A dedicated-team engagement that pairs a senior data engineer and a tech lead with Greyhound Engineering's existing analytics team. The work centers on Grafana-based dashboards integrated with SQL Server and the N3uron industrial-data API.

Dedicated AI Engineering Teams Read case study
READY?

Stop managing operations. Let the system run them.

Show us the workflow that's eating your week. We will map it, show you what AI can automate, and tell you what we will run for you.

Tell us what you are trying to solve. We will map your workflows and show you exactly what AI can automate, and what we will run for you.